>>2556152
>neet loser from 4chan with no talent or social skills
Yeah I'm sure they'd all be rushing to establish connections with you

>>103345770
its one thing to be doing it as 4chan anonymous, its another thing to be going on a corporate account and undermining your buddy's business reputation for a bit.

Imagine trying too hard to normalize faggotry in 4chan of all places

>>512719746
I also saw it on /lit/. I've been on 4chan since 2008 or 2009. If you have any historical questions I can do my best to lend insight.

>>512718584
>How does your name being attached make that different in any way?
>You're still just as pathetic and impotent, it's just that people can see it.
It does make all the difference. The relative anonymity that the internet gave us until now was as revolutionary as the printing press or the birth control pill in it's implications for social change. By "relative anonymity" I mean that you're safe from the judgement of your primary social group - your parents, teachers, siblings, peers, extended family, your village or town. Only anonymity is true freedom, as this makes it possible to name and reveal social injustices and lies, that would otherwise be covered up. It allows millions of people - who otherwise would not have a voice - to speak up, without having to fear the consequences. Think of it as whistleblowers - we're all whistleblowers. The main reason 4chan, other websites and the internet in general had such a huge cultural impact (to the point of helping electing an American underdog presidential candidate - twice!) is that we had this relative anonymity. If the government strips the web of this protective privacy, the internet becomes basically useless in it's main form, that is a communication medium. If people are forced to comment under their real identity, we will never see any true radical comments ever again. The conversations would be as stimulating as the Yahoo weather forecast. Revolutionary thoughts, or even just everything that is truly offensive, would be banned to the lost corners of the dark web, or to tiny groups of private real world locations - where it would no longer have any impact on society whatsoever. We'd be back in the 1980s where the narratives would again be solely composed and conducted by governments, NGOs and the big media companies.

>>213682255
>>>/pol/!!

Do you want to marry a degenerate from 4chan? Well I'm playing cupid to fertile guys and fertile girls who are looking for a lifelong commitment.

Anyone interested in marrying someone from here and having kids with then dm me and tell me about yourself and I'll see if I can match you with someone.

4C82HZYHJ

I always wonder how empty someone's life has to be for them to spam 4chan like this

>>106214382
a few:
>rangeban israel and india
>remove /pol/, literally just spam outside of circlejerk generals
>get rid of rapeape and his crew
>migrate 4chan to imageboard software that is actually maintained
of course none of this will ever happen because this site will probably go down within the next year, maybe two.
>>106214728
kys
>>106215346
lain is ok but slow.
>>106215747
trvke, loli is gross as fuck, lolifags can go to 7ch or some other board.
>>106216025
ironically this is the only time i agree with lolitards in that "moralfags" are almost always worse in the long run. you have literal groomers everywhere else on the internet and real life and your sperging out over literal whos on 4cuck?

ill never trust any animal threads on 4chan no matter what - psychopath ruined it instant hide for me