4chan will always be the asscrack of the internet, fags or no fags

>>84038485
>>84039076
On one hand, I'm pretty sure introverted intuitives, and both introverted rationals(Thinking/Feeling main) would be drawn magnetically by something like 4chan. So it's perfectly within expectations.
On the other hand, generally in MBTI communities there are just types that the "theory" itself glazes the fuck out of because there is some significant anti-ESxx bias(getting reduced to the concrete, thus inferior form of sensation, as well as the social extraversion aspects that could show up very easily in introverts as per Jung)

>>84040951
>If it's truly perfect then there is no imperfection at all. Of course, that assumes an impossible consciousness, so we aren't even talking about anything real.
Impossible is fine.
If it can be stated to be imperfect, then it's imperfect...

>It needs to arrive to consciousness as such, though whether you can prove it actually belongs to the archetype itself is another story
Yes, belonging or holding or passing on or experiencing the quale is what I think archetypes don't do. Experience might be a maybe.

>From a higher PoV, like I said the difference is mostly about what's the role of a function and what's a complex/archetype
Roles are given by the psyche delegating it in some way.

>Though that reconfiguration either fundamentally changes the "perfectly dead" consciousness in a way that's not these things anymore, or replaces it with a completely different consciousness, which is also not these things anymore.
Does it, really?

>>84041228
>On one hand, I'm pretty sure introverted intuitives, and both introverted rationals(Thinking/Feeling main) would be drawn magnetically by something like 4chan
I'd destroy all imageboards and forums if I could. Touch grass, nerds.

>>558969359
4chan's /k/ has been garbage for far longer than that.

>>734057540
go back.
>>>/b/

>>218280882
It makes sense for normies but I'm still surprised at the effect she's had on 4chan. I get >>>/sp/, >>>>/int/ even, but I never expected a tatted, pierced, dyed hair pure American mixed zoomette to blow up on a bunch of other boards. I guess many anons, like many women, actually love what they claim to hate.
>>218281142
You guys claim to hate plenty of other American qts however.

>>18662763
you can't call someone creepy on 4chan this is a safe space anon nta

>>734057210
Except that image has no single dot in paint. Show me the script to recompute any image saved or posted on 4chan, because neither 4chan x or any new alternatives like 4chan-xt have them.
>inb4 it's some nebulous script that doesn't exist and was just thought up on the moment to make anyone talking bad about the game the same person

>>529514820
>Pakistan and North Korea granted them access to their nukes if they so request it. I would also expect bio and chemical weapons.

that would be so funny if it happened

oh, now I get a warning for
" 4chan is an English language website. Please post in English."
trolololol

I hate wasting 10 years of my life in this jew ridden place, the BBC threads should have given me a clue

>>558968934
Always, I meant it. I kind of forget you being from 4chan at times.