>>536800794
retarded reductive meme response

4chan was already going downhill in the early 2010's, since 2016 it's been completely unrecognizable

this board shouldn't even exist, politics are a normalfag hobby, but everything became political because normalfags are all addicted to social media that rams it down their throats and every nerd hobby in existence became infested with rainbow hairs shoving propaganda into everything

the reality is that the exact same thing happened to 4chan as the rest of the internet - it got flooded with retards thanks to smartphones

>>536805420
You have no argument and I'm actually 75. Reddit already exists, twitter already exists, discord and tiktok already exist. 4chan doesn't need to become those things or try and poach their userbases. If anything, 4chan should reboot with like half as many boards, both board merger April fool's events demonstrated that the monotony can be broken when organnic traffic isn't split over so many boards to the point a couple of spambots or autists stimming ritual posting can dominate discussions. During the DO4E one, even the blacked/cuck spambots on /b/ couldn't keep up, and they've been running for over a decade.

The issue with 4chan is that nobody who runs it knows how to code for shit and it's full of security issues.

Again, automatic defense doesn't matter or change the fact battles are won through the -3 diceroll.
I have never said EU4 and EU5 combat are dissimilar, that is a strawman on YOUR part.

It's interesting that your default response is to accuse people who disagree with you of having not played the game, despite the fact:
1. If you had played Victoria 2 for even a couple of hours you would realize how important baiting the AI to unfavorable terrain was, just like EU4 and EU5.
2. Forts automatically giving defense status was a later addition to EU4, so if you'd actually played it long term you'd realize it wasn't integral to EU4 combat. Despite this fact, I would still argue V2, EU4, and EU5 combat were similar because they were all still about baiting the AI to unfavorable terrain, even before this change was made to EU4 combat.
Perhaps you accusing others of not playing the games is pure projection, especially considering so much of your time is spent debating mechanics on 4chan instead of actually playing the games.

>>83361850
>>83362194
It's just stupid and selfish because for most of us, green status means normies might join. P1 gets away with it because he can argue his +1s are all 4chan adjacent, but realistically, if they're 4chan adjacent, then there should be no issue with them coming to the thread and just getting the unlock link, or hell, joining the group.
>>83361926
>It was maliciously done
Fair, I'm not here to argue that point. But I personally doubt he would have done it if there had not been months of people being very lax with orange status leading up to him doing it.
>>83362230
Thanks, I try my best to monitor the situation.

>>98188443
Shut the fuck up libtard. You're not going to besmirch all we've done for 4chan and the world, not when we're so close to winning.

>>112570876
You must be 18 years of age or over to post on 4chan

>>34605633
posting on 4chan

>>740807470
if normalfags had their way anime on this anime imageboard would be completely quarantined on /a/. it's complete hypocrisy to have treated bronies that way. your idea of "being obnoxious" would be like if a pony reaction image was used even if they were talking about video games. it's functionally no different when faggots complain about anime pics here.
they are also literally originated here. "brony" was coined on 4chan. it's unambiguously a part of site culture.

>>740807207
>>740807601
>>740807790
>>>/u/