>>749393764
>Everyone on 4chan is a single person.
Lol.
I repeat what people said before, never cared for first or second party shit on even old sony or on steam, why I'm supposed to care about first party slop like pokemon all of the sudden?
I have always bought consoles for the third party JP AA and single A releases, why are you acting like I give a shit about pokemon? I care about releases like shine post, not about normalfag and ironic weeb goyslop like pokemon and CHslop.

Dear mods, please remove this mio avatarfag spam thread or move it to the >>>/trash/ where it belongs (4th thread)

Thank you

A clone would still have to be made as an embryo and then a baby why aren't any of you schizos ever taking that into consideration
>>>>>/x/

>>954901399
>nigger doesnt know anons often post a link to some file outside of 4chan, thats larger and with audio
NEWFAG NIGGER LMFAO

>>85731510
You use them permanently, the damage is done. Your eyes are sunken and there's a thin line on your nose that makes you look fatigued.
Fuck off to >>>/soc/

>>749393614
>and have spent more time trying to justify their purchase on 4chan than actually playing it
see you in the next thread

>>131791026
twitter is actually worse than 4chan, kpop discussion here is fairly civil by comparison

Twitter hates 2 of my fav groups discourse is nearly impossible there while i see people posting and celebrating them here

>>4125849
>Like I'm hearing ten different things about some guy on e6
not really.
people are being pretty straight forward about that guy.
>I'm hearing he's being accused of one thing, only for that thing to be someone else, then someone tries to reroute it back to him, but then it turns he's doing something else.
that's not happening at all
oh,
oh no it's you. I see.
>>4125851
it takes all kinds to make up 4chan, doesn't it?

>>155817958
Alright

Why do we criminalize child pornography? We've already decided that vulgarity by and of itself is not a legal case for censorship, I forget what court case but I think it had something to do with Hustler, if you get in my face I might look it up exactly, but I know we don't. Hence why no one calls for scat or guro to be banned, in any serious function. So why do we ban child pornography?

Because the creation of such material directly involves the physical harm to a child and damages their development, of which I imagine you wouldn't argue or you'd be defending pedophilia itself. DRAWINGS do not involve a child, seeing as how pornography of adults do not involve an adult. We don't care about what happens to adults OR cartoons, regardless of their body shapes or features, because they are either figures that can consent (and if they don't THEN you have a case but that's not applicable to loli because) OR they're drawings given identity and not real. Similar to how the depiction of a mass shooting on a television show, or a video game, is not an actual mass shooting, the drawing of a sexual act is not a sexual act.

If you wish to criminalize loli, you would have two avenues to be succesful. You would have to regard it as real, to charge as CP, which breaks that legal precedent that all other events in film and video and such are real too. The other is to open the case for censorship for vulgarity, which has a ripple effect of other vulgarities being illegal and quickly snowballing into speech censorship. Our legal code extends and retracts on established precedents, and you have no dam to restrict to this topic.

The only legally responsible measure is to allow loli, as it doesn't rock the apple cart, and you can just ban them from sites under private ownership rules, like 4chan, as it is.

This thread is not comics and cartoons and I imagine typing all this is pointless because jannies already got to this thread but let's see.