>>740125640
99% of those shitposts would disappear overnight if 4chan banned Brazil

>>84722058
>Except when they don't.
They virtually always do.

>If you say the same exact thing as Chad while looking like an incel, you get ostracized.
Potentially, yes, but Chads having more leeway doesn't imply that an incel's behavior has no effect.

>No. It's looks, which are random. So, effectively it's random.
It's looks and behavior. You can be average or good-looking and still be ostracized if you act like a weirdo. And conversely, you can be ugly and popular if you have a great personality.

>And you're trying to pretend that the world is just and people get what they deserve based on how they act. I'm nta, but it's obvious.
Never claimed the world is just. Never claimed that you always get out what you put in. I only claim that it's better to try your best than to give up and do nothing.

>That was NOT your argument, bro. You were saying people should join communities that enforce doing that shit. Hence why 4chan=bad
I think 4chan encourages a toxic and unhealthy mindset, and a decent portion of posters should be considered mentally deranged and potentially dangerous. It's not a community conducive to self-improvement.

>There's your just world fallacy again. The world doesn't work that way. Never did.
Notice I said "can become attainable". I didn't guarantee it. I don't believe in a just world, but I still say it's better to try. You're certainly not going to achieve anything by doing nothing.

>Lucidity, mostly. If the world sucks, then it sucks. One should not deny reality just for comfort.
Deny what reality exactly? That you're a failure? Most posters here refuse to even put in any effort. They have an attitude of being condemned to failure from birth. Not many people can achieve things without trying.

>If it doesn't, then how come saying you have no influence means you have no control?
>Then you can't influence it.
>Then you control what I think
>Pick one
I feel like you must know that you're wrong about this. You don't seem that dumb.

>>220923460
>Sam is known for doing viral marketing on 4chan.
>Pays somebody to post a thread on /tv/ about another incident.
>OH ITS ON HIS GUMROAD! TOTALLY GO WATCH IT GUYS! JUST PAY FOR IT!
>No proofs.
>Just a hint to go buy another useless gumroad episode of nothing.

>>42490428
it's shit posting
on 4chan
if it was meant to be enjoyable

normal folks would be doing it
duh...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrGrOK8oZG8

>>108969355
Only /pol/tards do this.
>>>/r/eddit/ whence you came

>>740134869
>Since graduating high school, literally never had a regular job other than some short-term gigs.

>A professional NEET for 20 years.

>literally don’t have a single friend or girlfriend.

>spending days immersed in 4chan, praying that AGI will solve everything.

Is there anyone out there stronger than me?

>>536310242
why do you hate Mormons, jew is it because is the last white threat to jews? as far as i know Mormons are the last standing organized group of whites that help eachother

the fact that you push this fabricated news everywhere and in multiple 4chan threads just tells me you wanna warm up people into accepting an open attack on mormons

I'm sorry JEW i wont be hating mormons and i will always be on the side of those who are are my closest genetically speaking

you wouldn't get it this is my superior moral stance i will always support my family first and second my fellow whites , this stance make JEWS like you seethe and cry

>>83208060
it's not about them as individual persons but rather their role as "leaders" that i take issue with. i don't give a shit who disagrees, in my eyes permanent bans are never okay and have no place in a 4chan-based group since there's only a finite amount of damage one can cause therefore only a finite (and proportional) removal is warranted.

i would go on but i'd come off as a schizo and you've been cordial so far basically leaders bad censorship bad but unironically

>>62306679
this is quite true. poor people say things that also absolve them of responsibility ("yeah i wasnt born rich like you") or even worse, try to give them a moral responsibility by putting down rich people (e.g. "youre only rich cause you cheated/exploited someone").

there are also cultural differences - germans are notoriously negative, they culturally have a "poor people mentality" (they're also penny pinching af). compare their attitude to americans.

but also on an individual. whenever i say, e.g. on 4chan, that i have 6 million USD in stocks, some people ask "wow, nice, how'd you do it?" while others say "haha larp why would you be on 4chan then lmao larp".

the difference between rich people and broke people is 99% mentality/attitude. rich parents are rich because they have the right attitude (unless they themselves inherited the money, then a good attitude is not guaranteed). poor people always have a bad attitude. i never met a brokie in a first world country with a good attitude. never.
poor people in US/Europe are evil people.

>>24444604
it do be like that
>jacob shows claire how to post on 4chan
>claire gets the rest of bitchtank to post on 4chan
>all the texts are leaked about claire and abi
>then shadi leaks everything about ellie
>/bant/ gets a new lease on life