>>62403789
Just do leveraged bogle.

In my portfolio all the monthly buying goes into income covered call funds. This is a strategic choice because I do not feel any pressure or anxiety as I'm getting paid no matter what happens in the markets.
Then with the distributions I get I buy 3x leveraged etfs.
I'm currently studying some leveraged income that pay weekly which would give me opportunity to buy every week as it seems we have a big drawndown every week now.

Well, that's what I do and in a few years I'll be a wealthy leverage master. 4chan made me reformat this post so many times that I had to erase a lot of things I had written.

>>537695525
>"You will never find more wretched hive of scum and villainy."
4chan is a Christian board now.

>>537695595
Bicolor nipples with a drop shadow of what I'm guessing is thickened skin from hair chafing up until a half hour before the picture is taken
It looks like someone chewed the skin off them
I'm genuinely more insulted and offended by her nudes being a thing she inflicted on the world than the aggressive posting her comics on 4chan

>>155702481
I mostly see the racist stuff from Hispanics (especially Argentinians), that kind of humor is frowned upon here apart from a small subset of weirdos in 4chan and Twitter

>>65269774
>He claimed that the Han Chinese didn't marry off their princesses to secure alliances but that's blatantly untrue, just google Heqin.

I never said that retarded Soviet rapebaby. Link the thread.

I said the Han dynasty offered fake princesses who they falsely passed off as daughters of the Emperor while the Xiongnu chanyus married their real daughters to Han defectors like Li Ling.

The Xiongnu, Xianbei, Mongols, Manchus married off theri actual daughters to vassals as a custom

You were the one claiming Xiongnu exclusively took princesses and never gave them away, and linked to the Heqin article which said the Xiongnu married their daughters off to Han generals

The Xianbei practiced marrying off their daughters to Han nobles and the Tang dynasty emperors had maternal Xianbei ancestry and paternal Han ancestry and followed the Xianbei custom if marrying princesses off to vassals.

Mongols married their daughters off to vassal nobles like Kublai and Zhao Xian

Manchu Aisin Gioro gave their daughters to defectors.

The Ming and Song dynasty refused to marry any woman of the Imperial family off to vassals or barbarians, regardless if they were the Emperor's daughter, a distant cousin or unrelated Han woman.

It's an east Eurasian nomadic practice to marry daughters off to vassals, original Jurchens didn't do it but Manchus adopted the Mongol practice just like Tang dynasty adopted Xianbei customs due to maternal Xianbei blood.

Every time you lie, you can't link the actual thread where you claim what I said

Also I didn't throw melting over insults you retard

I posted the Soviet rape pasta in threads where nobody mentioned rapebabies or mutts

https://desuarchive.org/k/thread/65186319/#q65203698

I also ignored entire threads where you posted rapechink and rapebaby and Japanese, begging for my attention (I skip 4chan for days or weeks at a time)

I got the Soviet rape pasta from a Filipino who spammed it on pol his and k

>>98252454
>purposeful sabotage and outright refusal of the site's moderation to do anything about it.
Part of why the "start our own drive" doesn't seem very practical. How do we stop namefags, namefag apologists, and saboteurs from shitting up the thread without, ironically, something like making our own 4+4chan board where we can slowly build strength, while banning bad actors, waiting until the point all of us agree to migrate here once we have sufficient numbers to affect this community?

Remember that here, we can only bully them, which would not necessarily enough considering the prevalence of on 4chan in the past, where anons were a lot freer to shitpost at them relative to 4+4chan with mods being unfarly biased towards them.

>>98252504
>My take is that most people are not crazy enough to be able to exist in a vacuum where they're openly hated. They post off-topic because they have ego tied into it. Hate them open and truly enough, and they go away. This doesn't work with moderation. Case and point, the several anons who have been perma'd for nothing but the appearance of challenging namefag status quo.
The problem with this is that we DID have something like that, in pre-bunker /jc/. Yes, we had moderation, but it was more 4chan rules moderation than ruling in favor of specific namefags. You could shit on namefags plenty, even if it was liable to get you called a shitposter. The only times I got banned here were for thinly-veiled /pol/posting rather than insulting namefaggots.

>>42590195
everything this 100%
>there is only so much to talk about
especially this
I've been retooning for 5+ years (not flawlessly). after a while discussion is completely pointless, and you just have to do the fucking work while refining your own practice and awareness. and then it stops being work and becomes like the neighbors annoying dog that barks 24/7 and you learn to live without it driving you batshit

also 4chan is dying/dead

>>571690641
this is 4chan, you needs to have a mental illness to be around here, much less a video game board and a woke game, it's the minimum requirement

>>537689237
Attention is also controlled by corporations. What now? 10 anons from 4chan won't change it.
Overall you are right, but the most valuable thing for oligarchy/bureaucracy/aristocracy whatever you call it is keeping the control. Giving in on taxes would indicate the harnesses slipping out of their hands. Unacceptable.