>>734644295
>>>/trash/
>>>/vp/

>>43094422
>totally not because 4chan was offline for half a day

>>530342131
>If you can't verify the stockpile exists, then demo models don't really matter.
No, that’s not true. It’s proof they have the tech capabilities to manufacture it. It’s more likely they’re put older things on display than newer. and the “demo” model, which is not a demo model but a working model, is more likely to be proof they have superior tech in the works. Militaries tend to show you what they consider irrelevant for the purposes of intelligence advantages. You don’t have the correct sense for this stuff m8. Iran isnt just going to show you everything in their inventory so you can win a 4chan argument with “tits or gtfo” logic.

>>530343397
Congrats on finding that out. In my case, they shared my posts with people at the research institution where I worked. Once i started catching on certain intel-connected researchers were asking questions a bit too connected to my 4chan posts, they hacked all my devices and introduced themselves. They started manipulating the living shit out of me and destroyed my life, got me fired, and I haven't gotten a job since.

I even reported them to the oversight committee on intelligence, since what they did to me was in violation of the Constitution. Took a year for them to process the complaint, and i got back a reply saying the domestic intelligence service had been criticised in my case, but they could not elaborate due to national security.

I can't even sue for damages. They completely destroyed my life, you have no idea.

>>153802189

THE original 4chan pedophile. LeXplorer the God.

>>153801986
I just assume every single japanese poster is some westerner in Japan. I can't imagine a real Japanese giving a shit about 4chan to post in English when they have their own image boards.

>>>/trash/

I know there are no accounts on 4chan, it's just a way of saying to commit suicide without sounding so direct

>>25130468
>Of those that are poorly informed, if they happen to associate it [/lit/] with something bad you can add "well I browse the literature board, it's different" and it's done with.
kek how do you imagine this conversation going
>reading this book, heard about it from /lit/. it's pretty good
>What's /lit/?
>it's the literature board of 4chan
>4chan... isn't that where those crazy mass shooters post their manifestos? And where the incel neo-Nazis hang out?
>well I browse the literature board, it's different
>Oh, okay. So there's not like, mass shooter manifestos there or anything.
>no those come up sometimes
>Oh. But the neo-Nazis are in another place on 4chan, gotcha.
>no the neo-nazis are there too
>Oh. Ohh, right, but you're saying they don't contribute to the discussion, like they're an unfortunate reality but in the minority and everyone ignores them?
>nah, there's about the same amount of neo-nazis on /lit/ as anywhere else on 4chan, they drive a lot of the discussion actually
>Oh. Okay, but like, the incels, you're saying that it's different because there aren't incels?
>nah, every other thread is gender war slop, lots of people claim they don't read books by women
>So how is this different from the rest of 4chan?
>you can't post porn or gore in /lit/
>That's all?
>you're supposed to talk about books there
>Is that rule enforced?
>pretty loosely
>I'm going to be honest with you anon, it sounds like it's just 4chan minus the porn and gore.

>>43094405
I dunno, I could access 4chan if I just turned on my vpn