>>24929280
>First, you're in the wrong neighbourhood for advocating against pedophilia
As i said above dude.
If you want to Tell fags to go fuck themselves to their face you dont go to rural apalachia you go to california.
You go where the pedos are to tell them they suck.
>Second, a person of average intelligence will have the same reaction as you upon reading Lolita. It's a genuinely horrifying book that is made more horrifying by the prose. And normal people, not 4chan autists who think in absolutes and lack any understanding of nuance, hence everything is either bad or good to them, can understand that the subject matter is horrific but the execution is masterful. Your complain is that a horror book is written well, as if you can't write horror with an aesthetic prose. Poe did it. Lovecraft did it. Why not Nabokov?
Your just making an argument for why we should censor Poe and Lovecraft as well dude; but honestly i dont think that stands up.
No one "defends" Poe or Lovecraft's work the same way the defend Lolita.
They have no compelling defenders who speak endlessly (and slavishly) about the """proes"""" of describing cosmic demons or encasing a man in a wall of bricks.
More over child rape is just more immoral then either of these things; its a more of a danger for people to get into their head the idea that adults having sex with children is immoral then it is for them to think fucking fish people or tentacle dragons are normal as this is something that actually exists in the world and can compel people to accept it.
>Even Stephen King, the epitome of mainstream, has very dubious kid material that makes Nabokov read like a puritan prude.
Where does King ever portray a sexual relationship between an adult and a minor as acceptable/sympathetic?
>>24929283
Thanks for proving my point dude.
You read lolita and so you were compelled to write this.
You aren't really human anymore.
You are just a thing which does a thing; a mindless puppet compelled by instinct to do what you do without reason or ability to resist.
You are a soulless husk.
You are Nabokov's Gollum.

>>41913266
Nice? You are delusional. Although its still miles better than >>>/g/ and >>>/tv/ but thats comparing nuclear fecal matter with plain ol sewage. I really miss when /g/ was still tech literate and /g/ay
The only boards that I interact with are /int/ and /bant/ sadly.

>>23720504
>redneck hunting with his cousin
>posts tranime on 4chan

>>19424076
I don't use reddit because it's gay and retarded.

If 4chan was shut down, i'd probably retire from posting on the internet.

>>18213118
you wouldnt last on old 4chan

>>522997020
thats a lot of attention for such a small guy, from such noble lineages, on such a small forum.

it's almost as if...there's nothing noble about any of you, or i'm not such a small guy. maybe it's both.

maybe you're so fucking weak and i'm so fuckin big that you don't know what the fuck to actually do.

you already shut down 4chan because of me in january.

you gonna do it again, faggot?

>>83314161
your thread is very nice and on topic stay on here please >>>/r9k/

>>549170426
>yeah not the great argument you think it is
It's not meant to be a "great argument", I am simply hoping you'd realize you're disgracing your ancestors while thinking you're dunking on an imaginary indian. Imagine vomiting on 97% of your predecessors because their skin tone triggers you. Sad desu.
>selfawareness
You're not familiar with that at all, I'm surprised the word is part of your vocabulary. I used to be a depressed teenager browsing 4chan 24/7, I quit the site around the 2016 Trump election. I come here a few times a year to have a peek, I find it fascinating that the anons are essentially the same. The threads are the same, the aggressive replies are the same, even the reaction images are the same, it's like a time-capsule to over a decade ago. I actually smirk when I get an angry reply by an anon hurling insults thinking he's achieving anything, it's like visiting a zoo and watching a monkey angrily throwing feces at the window.

like this other unhinged loser (if he isn't you):
>>549171058

>>12228098
Ever since the 4chan hack in the middle of this year, the website got filled with even more automated indian bots and T-people mods who ofuscate for funsies, there is this asshole who flooded the board with Mortal Kombat threads under the excuse of that shitty cash in upscaled with AI ROM bundle that released months ago, then the Sega System floodspam, now them CONSTANTLY derailing romhacking threads, they are doing this for fun, making this board even more worthless that already has become, and YES, they will bully you with warns and bans (usually the latter or preceded by the former first) ilunder the "spam/off topic" nonsense, for pointing that something is wrong, you know who you are.

It's been pretty terrible since.

>>24930111
This board is notoriously illiterate. The joke of 4chan is that not one single board is about what its purported purpose is. Your appeal to authority, ironic considering you accused me of it, is sorely lacking considering all this.